<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRAFT.NET: BEST &#038; WORST OF PAST DRAFTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of the NBA's Washington Wizards</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: adnanajanah</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-29190</link>
		<dc:creator>adnanajanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-29190</guid>
		<description>we were not a playoff team before tawn came so it worked out. He gives us points and boards and thats what we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we were not a playoff team before tawn came so it worked out. He gives us points and boards and thats what we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mandel</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7991</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7991</guid>
		<description>True, but they ditched a salary and opened up room to build the team from other angles.

It's very hard to judge most trades, especially just on the players involved. That said, I too think we might have gotten more from the trade. Maybe we didn't *want* more, however?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but they ditched a salary and opened up room to build the team from other angles.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very hard to judge most trades, especially just on the players involved. That said, I too think we might have gotten more from the trade. Maybe we didn&#8217;t *want* more, however?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizardsdotcom</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7984</link>
		<dc:creator>wizardsdotcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7984</guid>
		<description>well said odawg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said odawg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odawg</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator>odawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7982</guid>
		<description>It was a great trade for both teams but I think that Dallas got the best of it. Stackhouse did a good job replacing Jamison as their sixth man and Harris is doing well for them also. The Wizards may have benefited from "addition by subtraction", but they ended up with less talent then Dallas did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great trade for both teams but I think that Dallas got the best of it. Stackhouse did a good job replacing Jamison as their sixth man and Harris is doing well for them also. The Wizards may have benefited from &#8220;addition by subtraction&#8221;, but they ended up with less talent then Dallas did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mandel</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7977</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwizardsblog.com/2007/05/29/draftnet-best-worst-of-the-past-10-drafts/#comment-7977</guid>
		<description>We won't be able to afford Varejao with Haywood and Thomas being so highly paid.

You never know what unexpected, trade, or sign-and-trade deals will come along, however, so keep your fingers crossed.

Maybe we'll get Tiago Splitter in the draft, and maybe he'll be a Varejao type player, and maybe....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We won&#8217;t be able to afford Varejao with Haywood and Thomas being so highly paid.</p>
<p>You never know what unexpected, trade, or sign-and-trade deals will come along, however, so keep your fingers crossed.</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;ll get Tiago Splitter in the draft, and maybe he&#8217;ll be a Varejao type player, and maybe&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
